Yvon
Chouinard
Patagonia, Inc.
by
Edmund R. Gray and Kimberly S. Petropoulos
"No business can be done on a dead planet. A company that is taking
the long view must accept that it has an obligation to minimize
its impact on the natural environment"
-Yvon
Chouinard
|
Patagonia,
Inc. was the largest of a group of companies owned
by the Lost Arrow Corporation. This privately owned
company, based in Ventura, California, was a pioneer
in the over $15 billion outdoor apparel and equipment
industry (Lehr, 2000). It was also nationally and
internationally renowned for its proactive envirenmental
policies, programs and positions.
Founded
by Yvon Chouinard, Patagonia Clothing was incorporated
in 1979 and in 1984 changed its name to Patagonia,
Inc. By1999 company sales had reached $182 million.
By then the firm was designing, manufacturing and
marketing a wide range of outdoor clothing and sporting
equipment ranging from surfboards to high alpine climbing
accessories. At that time Patagonia employed over
800 people worldwide, sold to 600 plus specialty retailers
in the United States
and Canada,
and operated 29 company-owned retail stores and outlets.
Among the company stores and outlets were four in
Europe, six in Japan
and two in Australia.
In addition, Patagonia
maintained a thriving internet and catalog mail order
business. The company outsourced the cutting and sewing
of its garments to some 50 contractors throughout
the world (Welling).
History
Yvon Chouinard was born in the French-speaking
region of Maine in 1938 and spoke only French when he and his family
arrived in Burbank,
California in 1945
(Patagonia, 1988).
During his teenage years Chouinard embarked on what
he referred to as his "fun hog" and "dirt-bag"
period, where he traveled around vagabond-style and
surfed and climbed extensively in the U.S.
and abroad (Patagonia,
1998). Chouinard remained an avid mountain climber,
surfer and fly fisherman after becoming a successful
entrepreneur. Patagonia's
success over the years can be attributed in large
part to his first-hand knowledge and love of the outdoors.
In 1999 Time
magazine designated Chouinard a "Hero for
the Planet" because of his leadership in environmental
work and his efforts to affect social change (Rosenblatt,
1999).
By the time he was 18 Chouinard was
not only an accomplished mountain climber but also
a self-taught blacksmith. Because he did not like
the soft metal pitons (climbing spikes) that were
being used then, he decided to forge his own out of
hard steel. Discovering that he could easily make
more pitons than he needed, he started selling extras
out of the back end of his car. A short time later,
he added a second product, carabiners (rings that
connect to pitons and also hold the climbing rope).
Business was profitable but climbing was still his
passion.
After a two-year hitch in the Army,
Chouinard returned to his fledgling business and moved
it out of his parent's back yard to a run-down facility
in Burbank; in 1966
he moved it again to a tin shed in Ventura
to be closer to the "good surf." It was
there that he joined forces with his climbing buddy,
Tom Frost, a Stanford-trained engineer. The two friends
formed Chouinard Equipment, Ltd., and transformed
the manufacturing process from a hand-made to a machine
shop operation. In an effort to promote mail-order
sales they issued a one page mimeographed product
sheet which included the admonition that they could
not promise a quick response during the peak climbing
months. This laid-back attitude became a distinguishing
feature of Patagonia's
business culture.
But perhaps an even more important
value emerged during the early years - the emphasis
on quality. Chouinard and Frost were almost fanatical
about making the finest climbing gear in the world.
Their products were also designed to have clean lines
and use as little material as possible. As a result,
the reputation of the company's products grew and
by 1970 Chouinard Equipment was the largest supplier
of climbing equipment in the United States.
But concomitant with their company's success, the
partners became concerned about the negative impact
their pitons were having on the environment. Many
popular climbing routes were becoming permanently
scarred by the repeated hammering of pitons into the
rock.
Finally, after witnessing first-hand
the destruction along a trail on Yosemite's El
Capitan, the partners made the momentous
decision to phase out pitons. To replace this key
product, they developed their version of the aluminum
chock which could be wedged by hand in and out of
cracks in the rocks. Although chocks were relatively
unfamiliar to American climbers, Chouinard and Frost
decided to promote them with the issuance of the first
Chouinard Equipment Catalog in 1972. The publication
opened with a 14-page essay describing the environmental
hazards of pitons and championing "clean climbing",
principally through the use of aluminum chocks. The
catalog promotion was a great success as many climbers
switched to the company's chocks and the product could
not be manufactured fast enough to meet demand.
During the 1970s, the number of outdoor
specialty stores grew rapidly. They provided a second
channel of distribution for the company's products
but Chouinard recognized that climbing gear was only
a fraction , about one percent, of their business.
In response, he experimented with importing rugby
shirts from England.
This initiative also proved to be a market triumph
and, in 1975, the company placed a standing order
for 3,000 shirts per month.
That year, however, also produced
a fateful conflict. Tom Frost and his wife opposed
Chouinard's expansion into soft goods as well as the
recent opening of a retail store. As a consequence,
the nine-year partnership was dissolved.
During the following year Chouinard
Equipment introduced clothing under the Patagonia
label and three years later Patagonia Clothing Corporation
was established. In 1984 Patagonia, Inc. was incorporated
as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Lost Arrow Corporation.
Other subsidiaries were Chouinard Equipment, Patagonia
Mail Order and Great Pacific Iron Works.
Early on, the Patagonia
line gained a reputation for quality. The clothing
was described as being "ridiculously overbuilt."
Follow-on products maintained the reputation for being
built-to-last but also embodied technical development.
The company's first technical product was insulated
Foamback Rainwear. Many other innovative products
followed. SynchillaŽ , a soft, non-pilling, double-faced,
fleece fabric was arguably Patagonia's
best-known product innovation. In 1998, the company
introduced Infurno garments which had the advantage
of allowing the user to adjust to shifts in temperature
without resorting to layering.
With the early success of its technical
products, Patagonia committed to a policy of investing significantly
in research and development. It established a fabric
department and a fully staffed fabric lab that worked
with a variety of textile mills on the development
of new fabrics.
Another important policy innovation
was the pioneering of bright colors in the 1980s.
Up to that time, outdoor garments tended to come in
bland colors such as khaki and forest green. Over
the years, Patagonia
introduced a series of brilliant colors such as cadmium
orange, burnt chili, butternut, and mineral blue.
The new colors were a hit with customers and together
with the appeal of high tech fabric propelled the
company's clothing line into the high-end fashion
segment of the industry, extending well beyond outdoor
shops and sportsmen.
The products were promoted through
the company's catalogs which featured striking photography
and graphic design. Photographers typically depicted
people at risk in beautiful natural locations and
the products were shown without models in vivid color.The
graphics in the catalogs were coordinated with text
carefully formulated to communicate the advantage
of each product.
In 1987, the company initiated a
project termed "Ground Zero" which resulted
in reducing the number of wholesale accounts from
900 to 650. The idea was to restructure the company's
wholesale business such that there would be a smaller
number of high-volume dealers. As part of this program,
product education and merchandising seminars were
put on for dealers and consultants were hired to help
set up Patagonia
in sections in key stores. At the same time, the company
continued on its path of cautiously opening
new, company-owned stores in locations with
good, but not the highest, foot traffic. In those
stores the company's policy was to thoroughly train
the sales staff on the technical aspects of its products
and on providing outstanding customer service.
Nineteen-eighty-nine was a significant
year for the Chouinard Empire. The parent company,
Lost Arrow, sold Chouinard Equipment Company to a
group of its former employees who relocated the company
to Salt Lake City and renamed it Black Diamond, Ltd.
Its products are still marked with Chouinard's original
blacksmith stamp. The sale was precipitated by a series
of lawsuits revolving around the issue of whether
climbers using Chouinard equipment had been properly
warned about the dangers of the sport. As a consequence
of the suits, the company's insurance premium escalated
2,000 percent in one year; the company filed for bankruptcy
giving the employees time to raise capital sufficient
for the buy-out.
The next several years proved to
be pivotal in the history of Patagonia.
Sales grew 40 percent in 1989 and the company reorganized
into eight semi-autonomous product divisions along
with its four traditional sales channels (retail,
wholesale, international and mail order). Another
banner year was projected for 1990 and it was anticipated
that Patagonia would
be a billion dollar company by the beginning of the
new century. To accommodate the predicted growth,
100 new people were hired and the Ventura
facility was enlarged. But, with the 1990-91 recession,
sales fell far short of established goals. Additionally,
trying to coordinate eight separate product lines
through four competing sales channels was severely
straining management's capability and ingenuity.
During this time period, Chouinard
became increasingly uncomfortable with the direction
of the company. He saw it growing well beyond its
original niche as an outdoor marketer. But more importantly,
he was concerned that it no longer matched his personal
values.
Chouinard and his wife began to rethink
Patagonia's direction.
To help in sorting things out, they flew to Florida to meet with a business consultant.
Chouinard explained to the consultant that he was
pessimistic about the fate of our environment and
was staying with the business to make money to give
to environmental causes. The consultant responded
that if this was his goal, he should sell the business
for a hundred million dollars or so, keep a little
for himself, and set up a foundation with the rest.
That would allow him to give away six to eight million
dollars a year and he might be able to persuade the
buyer to continue with the company's contribution
programs.
The consultant's advice was very
unsettling to the Chouinards and they returned to
Ventura
nonplused. But after a few months of soul searching,
they concluded that the money the company was contributing
to environmental causes barely made a dent in the
world's problems and that the greatest good they could
do would be to develop Patagonia
as an exemplar for other companies to emulate. Their
idea was that business firms could educate and lead
consumers to become environmentally responsible and,
in turn, consumers could influence government policy.
(Chouinard, 1995).
Concurrently, in 1991, Patagonia's
business problems came to a head when the firm's primary
lender drastically reduced its credit line, resulting
in a severe cash pinch. After first instituting austerity
measures such as freezing hiring and nonessential
travel, on July 31st, the company laid
off 150 people (20 percent of its work force). Shortly
thereafter both the CEO and the CFO resigned. The
layoff ushered in a new direction for the company
- one of controlled growth, prudent cash management,
and even greater dedication to environmental responsibility.
To this end, a newly developed statement of purpose
and core values expressing Chouinard's vision for
the company was agreed upon and published.
Eight years later, in October of
1999, Yvon Chouinard retired and Michael Crooke took
over as CEO of the Lost Arrow Corporation (Now composed
of Patagonia, Inc., Patagonia International, Patagonia
Mail Order, and Great Pacific Iron Works). As with
all company employees, Crooke had demonstrated a commitment
to the environment. He was formerly president of the
Conservation Alliance, a grant giving organization
for the outdoor apparel industry (Lehr, 1999). On
assuming the position of CEO, Crooke stated that he
intended to follow the strategic course set by Chouinard
and not stray from the company's environmental commitment
(Lehr, 1999).
Chouinard, who still owned the company,
stepped away from direct control to pursue other interests.
From an operating perspective, however, this was not
a drastic change. Chouinard had never been a hands-on
manager. His pattern was one of "long periods
of absence alternating with spells of intense involvement"
which typically focused on design concepts and the
championing of pet projects (Patagonia,
1998). As a consequence of this unique management
style, he relied heavily on a series of CEOs over
the years.
Chouinard's Philosophy
Yvon Chouinard never saw himself
as a businessman or manager; rather, his self-image
was that of a craftsman and outdoor sportsman. He
became a business man through fortuitous circumstances.
He even referred to himself as an "accidental
businessman." Nonetheless, he created and sustained
a very successful business. His original partner,
Tom Frost, has remarked, "The fact of the matter
is, he's a genius, a genius at business (Johnson,
2000).
Chouinard's personal beliefs translated
directly into Patagonia's environmental mission. He maintained a very
pessimistic view of the future of the natural environment.
He once said, " I'm just looking at the facts.
It's not an emotional thing with me. How to solve
some of it is unacceptable. We're in denial about
the real problems. It's going to cost society too
much. That's why I'm a real pessimist. But that doesn't
mean I sit back and don't do anything (Johnson, 2000).
Choinard spent years studying Zen
Buddhism, a philosophy that teaches that people should
focus on the process rather than the end result (Johnson,
2000). This may explain the apparent contradiction
between his belief that neither he personally nor
his company can have a significant impact on solving
the world's environmental problems, and his actions
in developing his company as a paragon of environmental
responsibility.
In line with his beliefs, Chouinard
both personally and through his company, supported
a broad spectrum of environmental and social causes
over the years. One campaign
involved lobbying the states of Maine
and Washington to remove dams
blocking salmon from reaching upstream spawning grounds.
He also helped fund Julia "Butterfly" Hill,
who lived for two years in a Northern California redwood tree protesting deforestation.
On-going concerns of Chouinard included strip mining
and habitat protection. He also supported human rights
issues, particularly concerns for child labor and
sweat shops. Furthermore, because of his conviction
that environmental degradation was fueled by a growing
population, he supported pro-choice activists.
Chouinard demonstrated a special
concern for environmental disputes in Ventura
County.
In the 1980s he and his wife publicly campaigned against
the State of California's
plan to build a university campus on the seaside bluff
north of the Ventura River (Lehr, 1999). He was so committed
to the cause that he even threatened to move his company
out of the county, The state eventually redirected
its plans to a site outside of Ventura County.
Chouinard also consistently supported the candidates
for the Ventura City Council who were pledged to preserving
the ecology of the area.
Another important dimension of Chouinard's
philosophy is his almost fanatical concern for quality.
He saw the consumer economy as a key component of
the environmental crisis. He suggested that the notion
of "sustainable manufacturing" is an oxymoron,
i.e. all manufacturing processes use resources and
pollute (Chouinard, 1995). Moreover, he contended
that the American throwaway mentality exacerbated
the problem immensely. The antidote, he argued, is
quality. If we make products that last, consumers
will purchase less, leading, in turn, to lower production
and consequently reduced demand for natural resources
and less pollution. Chouinard firmly believed that
firms should not build in product obsolescence and
asserted that Patagonia's goal was to, "offer
only viable, excellent products that are as multifunctional
as possible so costumers can consume less but consume
better (Chouinard, 1995)
Simplicity was also a key ingredient
of Chouinard's philosophy. It was an aesthetic value
but also a discipline for using less of Earth's resources.
Chouinard was fond of quoting the twentieth century
French author and pilot, Antoine de Saint Exupery
(Chouinard, 1995)
| "In
anything at all, perfection is finally attained
not when there is no longer anything to add, but
when there is no longer anything to take away,
when the body has been stripped down to its nakedness." |
Environmental Strategy
Patagonia's
grand strategy was to design and market high quality,
durable outdoor sportswear and equipment while simultaneously
working to protect the environment. Customer value
and innovative design were essential components of
the company's marketing strategy and visionary environmental
initiatives were at the core of its social mission.
As early as 1974, the company began
to donate money to a variety of grassroots environmental
organizations and individuals. Its Environmental Grants
Program was launched in 1985 and by 2002 had given
over $14 million to more than 900 different groups.
The program was funded by Patagonia's "Earth Tax" which was a yearly levy
of one percent of sales or ten percent of pre-tax
profit, whichever was greater.
In the early 1990s with the grants
program well established, the company began to take
an introspective look at its own operations and their
impact on the environment. A formal internal assessment
process was introduced which eventually led to the
use of synthetic fleece, organic cotton, green building
practices and more.
Synthetic Fleece
In 1993, Patagonia
began to use synthetic "Synchilla" fleece
(PCR fleece) made from recycled plastic bottles instead
of petroleum-based polyester. The company established
a relationship with Wellman, Inc., a leading fiber
manufacturer, to develop this innovative fleece product.
By the Fall of 1999, almost all of Patagonia's
fleece products contained at least 90 percent post-consumer
recycled plastic bottle content. Moreover, Patagonia
was initially successful in convincing other apparel
manufacturers to use this material because of its
environmental advantages. Many of those companies
subsequently stopped using it because of its higher
cost, but Patagonia
maintained its commitment. The company estimated that
3,700 two liter plastic bottles would produce enough
material for approximately 150 Synchilla fleece garments.
In the process, a barrel of crude oil would be saved,
preventing about half a ton of toxic emissions from
entering the atmosphere (Patagonia,
"Our Commitment to PRC Fiber").
Organic Cotton
In 1996, Patagonia
switched its entire line of sportswear to organically
grown cotton. When the company's executives looked
closely at the environmental impact of their various
input fibers, they were surprised to discover that
conventional cotton farming was very environmentally
destructive. The learned, for example, that 25 percent
of all pesticides applied worldwide were used in the
production of cotton (Patagonia, "Vital Statistics"). Initially the
switch to organic cotton was more beneficial to the
environment than to the bottom line. When Patagonia
started to use organic cotton its sales volume dropped
significantly because the clothing line was more expensive,
reflecting a higher material cost. Positive consumer
response was slow to be realized. Moreover, for the
company to have a steady supply of organic cotton
it had to work directly with individual farmers; and,
in some cases it was necessary to co-sign loans to
insure production (Rosenblatt, 1999). Sales of organic
cotton clothing grew slowly and by 2001 Patagonia was using about four million pounds of this organically
friendly material per year.
Similar to its campaign to promote
PCR fleece, Patagonia also tried to persuade the industry to use organic
cotton. The company organized tours of organic farms
for the executives of other clothing firms with the
hope of convincing them of the merits of this product,
but because of the significant cost differential,
few switched. In another move to promote organic cotton,
Patagonia created
a subsidiary named Beneficial Ts. This company produced
and sold one hundred percent organic cotton t-shirt
blank to other apparel manufacturers. Within a few
years this subsidiary sold over 1.5 million t-shirts
(Welling, 1999)
Green Buildings, Green Energy
Part of Patagonia's
internal assessment was to continually monitor the
environmental impact of its facilities and operations.
As a result, a new distribution center in Reno, Nevada and a new multipurpose
building in Ventura
were built using all recycled or reclaimed products.
Furthermore, in 1998, Patagonia became the first company
in California
to commit to 100 percent wind-power energy (Brooks,
1998). It Denver store also bought wind-produced energy.
Although wind energy was originally 10-15 percent
more expensive than conventional energy, it was viewed
as an essential component of the company's environmental
obligation. The company expected the premium to decrease
over time (Patagonia,
1998).
Whenever possible Patagonia
attempted to restore old buildings rather than build
new ones. The new Patagonia store, located on Columbus
Avenue in New York City, was housed in a restored
red brick building that was built in 1898 (Patagonia
Opens Store in Columbus Avenue, 1999). At the Ventura
site, a storage building that needed to be removed
was dismantled and then shipped to the Oglala-Souix
Reservation in South
Dakota where it was reconstructed.
Other Innovations
In 1994, out of concern that 18 percent
of all fabric ended up as scraps in landfills, Patagonia
turned its attention to the collection and recycling
of scrap fleece. The company helped fund a business
that would collect fabric scraps and then sell them
to a plastic recycler for eventual use as insulation,
stuffing in toys and other similar applications (Patagonia,
1998). Then, in 1998, the company took a unique step
by "pre-cycling its own scraps for use in producing
infant clothing. Under the "pre-cycle" concept,
fabric scraps are anticipated and incorporated into
the design and production process. To apply this concept,
Patagonia worked
with designer and manufacturer to rearrange the pattern
layout for its adult garments such that suitable pieces
of material remained as input for its new infant clothing
line called "Seedlings" ("Patagonia
Cultivates Seedlings", 1998).
Organizational Culture and Control
Patagonia
has developed a unique culture that values employees
who are highly committed to accomplishing the company's
purpose and living by its stated values. Chouinard,
skeptical of business types, generally preferred to
hire "dirt-bags" and have them learn the
business, rather than hiring business people and trying
to convert them to Patagonia's values (Wells, 1992).
Consequently, almost all of Patagonia's
employees were active environmentalists and outdoor
sports enthusiasts. In the employment interview process,
company officials not only examined the job qualifications
of the candidates but also their environmental and
leadership philosophies, as well as their recreation
preferences (Solomon, 1998).
Chouinard, in a 1995 interview, stated
that sales-per-employee was one of the key control
standards that management considered at the end of
the year. Since sales-per -employee measures how efficiently
a company operates, he believed that through monitoring
this metric, unfortunate events, such as the layoffs
of 1991, could be avoided (Scott, 1995).
In addition to stressing high sales-per-employee,
management controlled operating costs by paying salaries
that were somewhat lower than industry standards.
Nevertheless, the turnover rate at the company's main
facility was only 4.5 percent compared to the industry
average of 20-25 percent (Olsen, 1997). Lower salaries,
coupled with a low turnover rate, gave credence to
the prevailing belief that most Patagonia
employees worked for the company principally because
they believed in its mission and appreciated its employee-friendly
work environment.
Patagonia's
work environment was characterized as relaxed, friendly
and casual. No one wore a suit and t-shirts, shorts
or jeans and sandals were common attire. There were
no dividers or cubicles in company buildings and it
was not uncommon to see a surfboard propped up against
someone's desk. The lack of private offices facilitated
open communication and the exchange of ideas. Employees
typically worked in teams to develop products and
to solve problems. The employee cafeteria was open
and airy, providing yet another space for employees
to meet and communicate.
Although there was a basketball court
on site and a beach nearby, Patagonia's
day-to-day business operations could be stressful
and demanding. In a very competitive industry, Patagonia employees had to design and produce products of
the highest quality while simultaneously minimizing
their impact on the environment. Employees seemed
willing and able to meet this challenge within their
flexible work environment. Chouinard was noted for
saying, " When the surf's up, surf." , and
many employees did, even during working hours. However,
they knew that they still had to complete the day's
assignments and meet their deadlines.
Human Resource Policies
Patagonia's
policies and benefits were designed to support the
company's employees, mission and culture. The company
was considered a pioneer in on-site childcare programs.
In 1984, the company opened the Great
Pacific Child
Development
Center.
Malinda Chouinard was the driving figure behind this
initiative. The facility helped the firm's working
mothers integrate their work and parental responsibilities.
That was important because 55-60 percent of the employees
were women. Moreover, the cost savings associated
with the child care center and related programs could
be quantified. The company estimated that each year
it saved money above its total subsidy to its work-family
programs. The savings came in the form of tax deductions
and credits as well as in lower employee recruiting
and training costs. There were also other benefits
which the company believed were real but could not
be quantified such as improved employee morale, increased
productivity, reduced absenteeism and an expanded
recruitment base (Family Services). Largely because
of its childcare center, Patagonia for eleven years
in a row found itself listed on Working Mother's list of "100 Best Companies for Working Mothers"
(Moraga, 1998).
In another popular program, all employees
at the company were offered flextime hours that could
be varied on a daily basis. Also, each year, workers
were offered five days of paid leave for volunteer
activities at their children's schools (Brooks, 1998).
In addition, under the Patagonia Internship Program,
employees could leave for one or two months (benefits
and salary maintained by the company while the employee
was gone) to work for a non-profit organization, usually
on some aspect of environmental activism.
Patagonia
had a policy of not hiring long-term temporary employees
to replace those on family leave or an environmental
internship (placing additional pressure on the remaining
staff to get the job done). Such employees were not
used because the company believed they would likely
clash with the strong Patagonian culture (Solomon,
1998). Moreover, since Patagonia
prided itself on a culture that was nurturing and
supportive of its employees, the use of long term
temporary employees would have been inconsistent because
they could never be wholly a part of the organization.
Conclusion
Yvon Chouinard was in excellent physical
condition when he handed the top job at Patagonia
to his successor, Michael Crooke. Chouinard organized
a climb at Yosemite
the same month he retired from active management.
He was also in excellent mental condition. He retired
with the intention of focusing his creative efforts
on the development of an unbreakable surfboard. His
plan was to do that with the help of his son, Fletcher,
operating out of a tin shed in Ventura. That location bore
more than a passing resemblance to the place where
he started his foray into the business world over
forty years earlier.
References
Adelson, A., " Wedded to Its
Moral Imperatives," New York Times, May 16, 1999.
Brooks, N, "Patagonia's
Energy Budget to be Spent on Wind Power, " Los Angeles Times, Section D, July 7,1998.
Brooks, N., "Work and Careers:
Balancing Act; When it Comes to Environment, Some
Employers are Mother-Superior," Los Angeles Times, Oct. 4, 1998.
Chouinard, Yvon. The
Next Hundred Years. Patagonia,
1995.
Defining
Quality: A Brief Description of How We Got Here, Patagonia,
Inc., 1998.
"Family Services", a posting
on the Patagonia web site.
Johnson, B., " Time Names Patagonia
Founder 'Hero for the Planet' ", Ventura County Star,
News Section, Oct. 9, 1999.
Johnson, B., "Climbing All the
Way," Ventura County Star, News Section, Feb. 27, 2000.
Lehr, J., "Patagonia Boss Will
Step Aside, Ventura County
Star,
Business Section, Sept. 15, 1999.
Lehr, J., " New Chief Bullish
on Patagonia," Ventura County
Star,
Business Section, Feb. 27,2000.
Moraga,
F. "Working Mother Gives Patagonia Honors,"
Ventura County Star. Business Section, Sept. 2, 1998.
"Our Commitment to PRC Fiber,"
Patagonia, Inc. web site.
"Patagonia
Cultivates Seedlings," Sportstyle,
Dec., 1998.
Patagonia, Inc. Press
Packet. 1998.
Patagonia, Inc. Louder
Than Words. 1998
"Patagonia
Opens Store in Columbus
Ave," Women's
Wear Daily, Sept. 16, 1999
Rosenblatt, R., "The Root of
all Good: Reaching the Top by Doing the Right Thing,"
Time, Oct. 18,1999.
Scott, M., " Interview:Yvon
Chouinard, " Business Ethics, May/June, 1995.
Solomon, C, " A Day in the Life
of Terri Wolfe: Maintaining Corporate Culture, Workforce,
June, 1998.
Speeches: Remarks of David Olsen
at the Alliance of
Work/Life Professionals Annual Conference, Feb. 5,
1997 as reported on the Patagonia web site.
"Vital Statistics," Patagonia,
Inc. web site.
Wellington,
H., " Patagonia: Small World View of Big Business," Apparel Industry Magazine, Dec. 1999.
and Patagonia, Inc. Mail Order Catalog, Fall, 1998.
Wells, "Lost in Patagonia,"
Inc., Aug. 1992.
|