ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON
JAMES JOHNSON
And
ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON II
For most of the twentieth century, one of America’s
most distinguished corporations was Johnson and Johnson.
The company was a financial giant in the health care
industry and a paragon of corporate ethical excellence.
The two men most responsible for this accomplishment
were a father and son team – Robert Wood Johnson
and Robert Wood Johnson II. Partial credit also belongs
to James Johnson, brother of the father. The historical
sketch which follows relies heavily on Lawrence G. Foster’s
Robert Wood Johnson.
ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON
Robert Wood Johnson was born in rural Pennsylvania
on February 15, 1845. He was the eighth child born to
Sylvester and Louisa Johnson. His family’s 151
acre farm provided such a modest existence that the
father took a variety of odd jobs to support the family.
Robert attended a Methodist boarding school for three
years before being sent to Poughkeepsie, New York where
he became an apprentice in a local apothecary. His place
of business was owned by his mother’s cousin James
G. Wood. He lived in the Wood home.
James Wood was an excellent mentor for young Robert.
He insisted that the apprentice begin doing the menial
chores and gradually promoted him to jobs requiring
specialized knowledge. A breakthrough event occurred
when James Wood taught his young relative the difficult
art of making medicinal plasters.
Robert Wood completed his apprenticeship in 1864 and
moved to New York City where he took a job as an order
clerk at a wholesale drug firm. He was nineteen years
old.
By 1868 Robert was ready to start his own business.
He secured a desk at 36 Platt Street in the downtown
business area of New York and opened for business as
a broker and importer of drugs and chemicals.
Robert soon became friends with another broker, George
Seabury. The two talked about forming a partnership
and eventually did so as equal partners in 1873. They
called their firm Seabury and Johnson. Seabury took
the job of president and Johnson became secretary and
sales manager. Johnson also began to experiment with
the making of spread plasters. He eventually learned
how to produce a marketable product which then helped
Seabury and Johnson to experience significant growth.
The firm’s growth eventually required a move to
a larger facility in South Brooklyn.
Over time the relationship between Johnson and Seabury
became strained. The strain showed up in contentious
partner meetings. One of Johnson’s biographers
suggests that a basic difference was Johnson’s
stronger propensity to try new ideas ( Foster, p.31).
And the same biographer alludes to a need to be in control
as a prominent feature of Johnson’s personality
if not also of Seabury’s. The tension increased
when Seabury successfully proposed bringing a brother
into the firm. Johnson responded by bringing in two
brothers – Mead and James. James demonstrated
a talent for operations management and was eventually
put in charge of the firm’s manufacturing operations.
It is possible that his success was an additional source
of Seabury’s ill will toward Robert Johnson.
Whatever the explanation, the fact of the matter is
that the personality clashes escalated to the point
where each of the two men took turns offering to be
bought out by the other. Eventually, Robert Johnson
won that contest of wills and was bought out by Seabury.
The agreement called for Seabury to make installment
payments to Johnson and for Johnson to agree that he
would not participate in a competing business for ten
years.
JAMES AND MEAD JOHNSON START A NEW BUSINESS
James and Mead Johnson were not covered by their brother’s
non-compete agreement and the two brothers were, therefore,
able to start a new business manufacturing plasters.
They borrowed $1,000 and located in a vacant factory
building which was available in New Brunswick, New Jersey.
The starting work force consisted of fourteen employees.
James was responsible for manufacturing operations while
Mead handled sales. Because this business competed with
Seabury, Robert was not able to participate in any manner.
The slow and uncertain progress of James’ and
Mead’s new business called for the recruitment
of someone with brother Robert’s leadership abilities.
Robert, of course, was not available because of his
non-compete agreement with Seabury. But Seabury began
to have trouble making the required buyout installment
payments to Robert. And so Robert signed a new agreement
with Seabury, one which absolved Seabury of future payments
and therefore allowed Robert to reenter the business.
Biographer Lawrence Foster tells us that Robert Johnson’s
arrival immediately changed the firm’s prospects.
As he puts it ( Foster, p. 46):
| “Modesty was not one of Johnson’s
strengths. He did not hesitate to say that his brothers
had gotten off to what he described as “ a
feeble start” without him, but he was now
ready to change that. This new surge of spirit was
quickly transmitted to the small band of factory
workers in New Brunswick …They were well aware
of his reputation for getting the job done and how
determined he could be. As he established contact
with larger numbers of customers, the orders began
pouring in and the production line moved faster.
Both the motivator and the money had indeed arrived.” |
Within a year sales growth had caused the company’s
employment to increase from 40 to 125 persons. The Johnson
brothers felt justified in publishing a thirty-two-page
catalog.
On October 28,1887, the company was incorporated with
a capital investment of $100,000 . Robert Johnson held
forty percent of the stock and was named president of
the company. James and Mead each held thirty percent
of the common stock. James was named general manager
of manufacturing and Mead became the company’s
secretary.
Among the new products added by Johnson and Johnson
was a line of antiseptic dressings. This product line
incorporated the controversial thinking of Dr. Joseph
Lister regarding infections. Lister was a British surgeon
who believed in and did something about Louis Pasteur’s
theory that bacteria caused infections which often led
to death following surgery. Lister’s solution
was to kill the bacteria by pouring carbolic acid on
the open wound or surgical incision and then covering
it with a dressing also saturated with carbolic acid.
Lister made a lecture tour in the United States in
1876, Robert Johnson attended one of the lectures and
became a champion of the concept. He also saw a business
opportunity. The surgical dressings available in that
time offered substantial room for improvement and Johnson
developed a vision of being a major contributor to such
improvements.
The new line of dressings in Johnson and Johnson’s
1887 catalog represented the latest chapter in that
effort ( Foster,p.49). The dressings offered improved
absorbency by using cotton (Foster, p.49). Robert Johnson,
himself, “ … developed an ingenious disposable
sponge, or dressing, made of layers of absorbent cotton,
and coconut and manila fibers, with a small capsule
containing an antiseptic hidden in the center”
(Foster, p.49).
In 1887 Johnson began to spend less time in his New
York City office and more time at the New Brunswick
office. There, “ He immersed himself in every
aspect of the business, even opening the company’s
mail every morning – a ritual he followed throughout
his business life” (Foster, p.52). That statement
needs to be qualified with the observation that in later
years Johnson would spend extended periods of time traveling
while still serving as the company’s chief executive
officer.
It was also in 1887 that Johnson met local New Brunswick
pharmacist, Fred Kilmer. Kilmer operated the Opera House
Pharmacy and, while still a young man, had already become
a prominent member of his profession. He had served
as president of the New Jersey Pharmaceutical Association
in 1886 (at the age of 35). And he was a leader in local
efforts to tackle public health problems. It was Kilmer
who persuaded the mayor to create what was to become
New Brunswick’s first Board of Health.
The two men developed a close friendship based on their
mutual interest in opportunities to improve health care
through research and education. Before long they agreed
to launch a joint effort to promote Listerism. As explained
by Foster ( p. 57):
| “During his frequent visits to the Opera
House Pharmacy, Johnson would talk about the need
to develop a broad educational program for physicians
in support of Listerism, a subject on which Kilmer
was both knowledgeable and sympathetic. The two
men ..began to devise a plan. Kilmer would start
corresponding with a group of well-known surgeons
who were believed to be advocates of Listerism.
and their experiences with the sterilization method
would be compiled into a manual and distributed
widely to physicians and hospitals. Meanwhile, Johnson
and his associates would work on improving the surgical
dressings that would be required in the operating
room in support of Lister’s concepts.”
|
In 1889 Johnson hired Kilmer as the company’s
Director of Scientific Affairs. Kilmer would remain
with the company for 45 years and would become one of
Johnson and Johnson’s most important assets.
By the end of 1891 Kilmer’s laboratory had discovered
the technical knowledge needed to mass-produce sterile
cotton and gauze dressings. Kilmer was not shy when
it came to evaluating the significance of this development.
In his words (Foster, p.60):
| “ Lister’s first methods were
crude but they were founded upon science and upon
art.... From Lister’s great conception was
born modern surgery. It is acknowledged that the
introduction of Johnson & Johnson dressings
marked the real beginning of antiseptic surgery
in this country; in fact, it placed reliable antiseptic
dressings within the reach of every practitioner.
This the Johnsons did at a time when many of the
profession were still in doubt about accepting the
doctrine and theory of antisepsis.” |
At about the same time Kilmer’s lab played a
major role in Johnson and Johnson’s introduction
of first aid products and somewhat accidentally developed
what was to eventually become the famous Johnson’s
Baby Powder (Foster, pp. 60-63).
The new line of first aid products originated from
Johnson’s chance discussion with a railroad’s
chief surgeon. The surgeon made Johnson aware of a potential
market for first aid kits to be used by surgeons in
the field ( Foster, p. 60). A kit was developed; Kilmer
became involved in writing a first aid manual; and soon
Johnson and Johnson first aid kits were being sold to
businesses of all kinds as well as to household.
As was true of other Johnson and Johnson products,
the first aid kits used a “Red Cross” symbol.
The symbol was not trade marked. In fact, many other
companies also used that symbol. But use of the symbol
was challenged when , in 1895, the United States Congress
passed a bill prohibiting any group other than the American
National Red Cross Society to use the symbol. Johnson
opposed the bill on the grounds that his company had
been using the symbol since its founding. President
Cleveland refused to sign the bill, leaving the issue
unresolved. Johnson then negotiated a deal with the
founder of the American National Red Cross, Clara Barton.
The Red Cross agreed to allow Johnson and Johnson to
use the symbol for a payment of one dollar. Thus, when
a similar bill was later signed by President Theodore
Roosevelt, the company’s right to use the symbol
was protected.
Another fruit of Fred Kilmer’s research department
was the development of “kola products” derived
from the coca plant and cola nuts. These products were
marketed as aids to stop nausea, increase stamina and
promote digestion among other effects. Kilmer and Mead
Johnson then became interested in products that might
be developed by using papaya fruit. The time Mead spent
on this project became an issue with his brothers. Therefore,
in 1897 Mead decided to sell his stock in Johnson and
Johnson and start his own pharmaceutical company, Mead
Johnson and Company.
Johnson and Johnson’s famous baby power product
was the result of a letter received by Kilmer. A physician
wrote that medicated plaster could cause skin irritation.
Kilmer sent to the doctor a container of talc to be
used to soothe the skin if needed. The incident was
discussed within the company and it was decided to start
packing plasters with a container of talc included.
Eventually the talc became a separate product known
as Johnson’s Baby Powder ( Foster, pp.63-64).
Kilmer and Robert Johnson were both committed to high
standards of product safety and effectiveness. To them
this was both a moral requirement and a long run source
of competitive advantage. The wisdom of their approach
seemed to them to be borne out with the passing of the
federal Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906. While less scrupulous
firms were forced to change methods and products, all
of Johnson and Johnson’s products and processes
met the new regulatory standards (Foster, p. 96).
It was also in 1906 that Robert Johnson created the
company’s Welfare Work Department. This was his
pioneering way of practicing his belief in an employer’s
social responsibility to employees. Here is how the
new department worked (Foster, p.97):
| “Workers were given advice on health
matters, referred to physicians and, in many cases
had their medical bills paid. Legal advice was provided,
and counseling on marriage and family problems.
The only subject the Welfare Department was not
permitted to advise on was religion. Classes were
conducted in hygiene, gymnastics, millinery, embroidery,
and English – the latter because many workers
were Hungarian immigrants. A mutual benefit organization
was formed to provide financial support during illnesses.
Hospital and retiring rooms were set up for those
taken sick on the job, and later became the company
Medical Department”. |
Johnson also initiated pension and medical plans for
some employees and encouraged the women employees to
form a social and educational club.
It was also during this time that Johnson revealed
his thinking regarding two threats faced by all businesses
– recessions and competition. Johnson’s
approach to a recession was to maintain employment while
cutting hours and lowering pay. That is what he did
when tested by the severe recession of 1907.
With regard competition, Johnson’s primary strategies
were innovation, quality and productivity. But he was
not above acquiring a potentially troublesome competitor.
That is how he dealt with the J. Ellwood Lee Company
which produced medicinal plasters and practiced sharp
price cutting. In 1905 Johnson and Johnson acquired
the Lee company, putting an end to that competitive
threat.
Robert Wood Johnson’s family life was colorful
and somewhat unorthodox. He married twice. He had a
daughter by his first marriage and two sons and a daughter
by his second. He was forty-seven years old at the time
of his second marriage and his bride, Evangeline Brewster,
was twenty years younger. Foster cites evidence that
her age prevented Evangeline from being accepted by
New Brunswick society but he also reports that neither
she nor her husband seemed to care ( Foster, p. 67).
Foster paints a picture of Johnson as a father who paid
attention to his children on a daily basis. He partnered
with Evangeline in creating a nurturing family environment.
And he made sure that the children were aware of their
good fortune and attendant social responsibilities (Foster,
pp.82-91).
Johnson’s idea of the good life included substantial
time devoted to recreation. “Like other wealthy
people of his day, Johnson’s vacations sometimes
stretched into weeks and months. He owned an island
in southern waters where he would shoot in winter, and
belonged to a fishing club in Labrador that held exclusive
rights to a long stretch of river…. But the real
focal point of his life was Johnson & Johnson, and
anything or anyone who threatened the company’s
success had to face an aroused ‘R.W.’ “
( Foster, pp.70-71). In spite of his long absences from
company premises, Johnson managed to inspire employee
commitment and provide continued strategic vision.
On January 31,1910 Johnson began to feel sick and
left his office early. A week later, on February 7th,
he died, a victim of Bright’s disease. Among the
tributes offered at the funeral was one by Fred Kilmer
which included the following statement (Foster, p.109):
| “ When once convinced that an article
which he could manufacture would save life and prevent
suffering, he caused it to be manufactured and placed
before the (medical) profession irrespective of
any consideration of profit.” |
JAMES JOHNSON
Johnson expected to be followed as Johnson & Johnson’s
head by his oldest son, Robert Wood Johnson II. But
Bobby, as he was then called, was only sixteen years
old when his father died. And so, on February 18th the
Board of Directors made James Johnson to succeed his
brother. James, of course, was one of the original company
founders and had played a prominent role from the start.
Yet many within the firm felt he lacked the leadership
skills necessary for the job. Were it not for the fact
that James controlled a decisive block of stock, the
job might have gone to someone else. The late Robert
Johnson had placed his company stock in a trust for
the children of his second marriage. That stock was
to be divided among the children when the youngest reached
age twenty-five (Foster, p.110).
As it turned out, the company did well during the
years of James’ 22 years of stewardship. It is
true that he was inactive for the last ten years of
his tenure. But by then Robert Wood “Bobby”
Johnson II had assumed a significant position of leadership.
James Johnson’s tenure may have provided the space
needed for Bobby to grow into the job of company leader.
ROBERT W. JOHNSON II
Robert W. “Bobby” Johnson II was born
on April 4, 1893. A second son, Seward, was born in
1895. But there was never any question that the oldest
son would become the successor manager. The two boys
got along well together. As adults they realized their
father’s ambition with Bobby serving as president
and Seward assisting him cooperatively and ably.
Bobby’s father was anxious for his son to grow
up and join the company. At home the father met daily
with Bobby to prepare him for his future life as a socially
responsible businessman. This mentoring took hold. Bobby
grew up with the ambition of following in his father’s
footsteps.
At school Bobby was expected to apply himself to his
studies. Those expectations were not totally realized.
One year, as a teenager, he repeatedly ran away from
a prep school in Princeton, New Jersey where he had
been placed. He ended up having to repeat his junior
year at Rutgers Prep in New Brunswick. There he settled
down and developed a liking for the military drill team
required for his course of study (Foster, p. 104). He
also found time to make frequent visits to the family’s
factory and while there to learn about the inner workings
of the company. The adults with whom he interacted found
him to be both curious and polite.
BOBBY JOINS JOHNSON AND JOHNSON
Bobby graduated from Rutgers Prep in June 1911. He
wanted to skip college and go to work full time at Johnson
and Johnson. But his mother and Uncle James persuaded
him to work part-time and take postgraduate courses
at Rutgers Prep. It wasn’t long before Bobby changed
his mind and was hired to work full-time in the lowest
level job in the Johnson and Johnson factory’s
powerhouse. His supervisor, foreman Walter Metts, reports
that Bobby was anxious to learn everything about the
powerhouse. Once he felt that he had learned enough,
Bobby managed to get a job in another department. And
so the pattern unfolded. As summarized by Foster ( p.113):
| “ Moving from job to job in the factory,
Robert developed an easy rapport with the workers,
a trait he retained throughout his life. He was
at ease with them and they with him. They called
him Bob, or Bobby, and adopted him as one of their
own, especially the ebullient Hungarians, many of
whom came to America because a job opportunity awaited
them at Johnson and Johnson.” |
After work Bobby spent a great deal of time drinking
with young friends. His drinking became common knowledge
in town and a concern to the company’s leadership.
On once occasion he arrived for work drunk. That was
the last straw for his Uncle James who told Bobby that
James would sell the company if Bobby didn't’t
stop his excessive drinking. Bobby immediately changed
his ways. Convinced that he had grown up the Board of
Directors made him one of its members on April 15, 1914.
The youthful Bobby had become a sober and serious Robert
Johnson II.
It was clear at that point the Robert would in all
likelihood eventually become the company president.
He was known to harbor the ambition and at age 25 he
would take possession of the largest block of company
stock, left to him by his father. But the senior men
who ran the company weren’t about to let Robert
become president until Robert had thoroughly proven
his abilities. The board initiated his long period of
apprenticeship in 1915 by appointing him head of a department
in the factory. Robert was twenty-two years old at the
time. Then, in 1918 Robert was named General Superintendent
in charge of manufacturing.
THREE IMPORTANT DEVELOPMENTS
Three other important developments occurred at this
time. One was the development of a special relationship
between Fred Kilmer and young Robert. Robert began visiting
Fred Kilmer ‘s laboratory. Soon he and Kilmer
established a close bond with Kilmer playing somewhat
of a father figure role.
The second development was Robert’s marriage
to Elizabeth Ross on October 18,1916.
The third development was Robert’s successful
effort to get his brother, Seward, to join the company.
Seward left his command of a Navy submarine chaser and
joined Johnson and Johnson in 1919. He joined the company
with full knowledge that his brother would always outrank
him within the company. As Foster puts it (p. 140):
| “ The competition that one might have
expected to develop between them in the family-owned
business never materialized. Seward was content
to allow his brother to assume the reins, and Robert
did not resist. Their personalities were well suited
to that arrangement. Robert was as naturally assertive
as Seward was restrained, and in the coming years
they developed an unusually close relationship that
ruled out head-to-head competition.” |
MAYOR ROBERT JOHNSON
When Robert recruited Seward he made it clear to his
brother that his greatest passion in life was Johnson
and Johnson. But Robert also found time to get involved
in local public affairs. In 1918 he was appointed to
fill an unexpired term on the Highland Park Borough
Council. A year later he ran for the seat and won with
the largest number of votes of any of the successful
council members. The council named him mayor in 1920.
His performance as mayor was very respectable. “
The streets were paved, the water system improved and
the cost of local government reduced” (Foster,
p.145). On one occasion a citizen called to complain
about garbage that had not been picked up. Robert was
at a party at the time. But without hesitation he left
the party and , still wearing his tuxedo, picked up
the garbage. Robert decided not to seek reelection because
of his desire to spend more time on the business. But
he did remain interested and active in politics and
public service for the rest of his life.
ROBERT JOHNSON EMERGES AS A STRATEGIC PLANNER
With more time to spend on the business, Robert became
somewhat of an unofficial strategic planner. In 1921
Robert became convinced that the United States was heading
into an era of protectionism that would hamper the export
business. He saw the establishment of manufacturing
facilities abroad as a way to offset that threat. In
1921 he asked the company’s Board of Control to
authorize him to travel abroad with Seward for the purpose
of studying the feasibility of operating plants abroad.
That was not an easy sell. Robert was not yet a member
of the Board of Control. But company president James
Johnson was on the board and he opposed the idea of
foreign manufacturing on the grounds that it would hurt
the company’s existing export business. So young
Robert Johnson assumed the burden of lobbying for the
trip against the opposition of his uncle. Eventually
the board agreed to the fact finding trip. The report
from the trip then led to the establishment of Johnson
and Johnson’s first foreign manufacturing venture.
A factory was leased in England and manufacturing began.
Robert Johnson recommended leasing a factory rather
than constructing one and gave the board the following
reasons ( Foster, p. 159):
| “ It would do until we learn how to
run a plant in England, and prove that we can win
customers … Leasing would let us get going
at once, and it also would save the firm money if
our experiment fails.” |
Robert also analyzed the impact of the increasing
size of the company on
Johnson and Johnson’s “family” culture.
He concluded that the family feeling was in
danger of being lost. His solution was to establish
an internal company publication that
would bring the employees closer together. Finding ways
to maintain that close feeling
would be a recurring theme of Robert’s career
at Johnson and Johnson.
Robert took these actions even though he was not yet
a member of the Board of Control, the small group of
executives who ran the company on a daily basis. This
small group of executives recognized that they would
ultimately cede power to Robert.Nevertheless, they were
men of strong character with a commitment to prevent
young Robert from doing something dangerously foolish
while maturing to the point of being ready to assume
the company’s presidency. One of the board members,
Frank Jones, went beyond merely acting as a brake on
Robert’s unwise plans. Jones, one of the company’s
best managers, assumed the role of Johnson’s mentor.
So a certain tension existed within the company. The
members of the Board of Control were opposed to naming
Robert president too soon and they had the power to
enforce their wishes. But Robert did have substantial
bargaining power.His formal power base was his positions
as a member of the board of directors and his title
of Second Vice President. His informal power base was
his ownership of a controlling block of company stock.
One interesting feature of this period of preparation
for Robert Johnson was his periodic “vacations.”
He and the board saw nothing wrong with him periodically
absenting himself from the business for weeks at a time.
Biographer Foster points out that ( p. 167):
| “ In a period when the calendar rather
than the clock was more important for measuring
most business and leisure activities, six weeks
spent sailing to Labrador was not considered an
abuse of time.” |
But, Foster adds, Johson’s trips typically excluded
his first wife, Elizabeth, and put a strain on their
marriage. Eventually they would be divorced.
Another element of Robert Johnson’s strategic
thinking was his conviction that factories should be
visually beautiful and functionally supportive of quality
living for the employees. In 1926 the company supported
that thinking by authorizing, “ the nation’s
first modern, single-story textile mill “ (Foster,
p 170). The factory was built on a large tract of land
in Gainesville, Georgia. The company planned to build
200 modern homes for the mill employees on the same
land. That housing development included plans for a
school, a medical facility and a few churches. In praising
this initiative, biographer Foster quotes the following
letter from a mill employee ( p. 170);
| “There was no child labor law then so
as we got big enough, not old enough, we went to
work. Spinners were paid 10 cents a day and doffer’s
wages were 35 cents. We worked eleven hours a day.
Then in 1927 we heard of the new mill at Chicopee,
and moved there with our four children and my mother.
We had a modern five-room house with all of the
modern conveniences, and went to work in a modern
mill where all was light and clean. A new life opened
for us.” |
Robert Johnson’s love affair with attractive
modern facilities would be a hallmark of his remaining
years at the company. He had a name for his vision –
“ Factories Can Be Beautiful”. And he ended
his career having constructed more than one hundred
beautiful facilities. Johnson also had a practical rationale
for his commitment to beauty. As biographer Foster puts
it ( p. 172):
| “ From the outset Johnson made it clear
that he was not motivated simply by the movement
toward modernism. To him, building attractive factories
made eminently sound business sense. Attractive
factories and pleasant working conditions generated
greater efficiency and pride among workers. Well-maintained
buildings promoted community acceptance of the company
and reflected the integrity of the company and its
products.” |
ROBERT JOHNSON JOINS THE BOARD OF CONTROL
On February 1, 1927, Robert Johnson was finally admitted
to membership on the company Board of Control. By then
he had worked for Johnson and Johnson for sixteen years.
He was still young, a mere thirty-three years old. And
his mental attitude was that of youth. As he put it
in a speech to his fellow board members, “ We
are passing through a time when the management who made
this business is letting go of the reins and the new
management is beginning to operate” (Foster, p.
172). Bobby’s admission into the “company
control room” marked the end of an era when the
company operated without a strong executive. From 1920
to 1927 the company had operated without a strong executive.
Uncle James Johnson held the title of company president
during those years. But James had health problems so
serious that he was not active in day-to-day management
of the company. Nor was he active in strategic decision-making.
By the time Robert Johnson joined the Board of Control
he was already acting as if he were the man in charge.
And, that was not totally out of place, given his ownership
of the controlling block of company stock. Yet a few
more years would pass before he was finally given a
formal title in keeping with his attitude and behavior.
Finally,on February 4, 1930 he was named Vice President
and General Manager of the company. Uncle James still
held the title of president even though he was still
not active in the business . Neither the board of directors
nor Robert Johnson wished to remove James, so a one
year wait ensued before James finally resigned the presidency
in May of 1932. Robert Johnson waited a discreet period
of time and then allowed himself to be named President
and General Manager on October 15, 1932. By then Robert
had worked for the company for twenty-two years. Almost
six years later, on May 17, 1938 Robert Johnson became
Johnson and Johnson’s first Chairman of the Board.
He remained in that position for the next twenty-five
years.
MANAGEMENT HIGHLIGHTS OF THE ROBERT JOHNSON YEARS
As Johnson and Johnson’s acknowledged new strong
leader, Robert Johnson was driven by the desire to push
the company to higher standards of excellence in many
directions. He envisioned the creation of a decentralized
management structure. He was obsessed with setting and
achieving higher standards of quality. He envisioned
what might be called a more humanistic approach to labor
in general and women employees in particular. He had
pet ideas for improved internal communications and company
advertising. He was determined to make the company an
international exemplar of high standards of business
ethics. He strongly believed in the social responsibility
of business and saw a role for Johnson and Johnson in
several areas of American social policy.
But before he could focus on these futuristic dreams,
Johnson had to deal with the problem of the Great Depression
which began in late 1929. He began warning the Board
of Directors of the danger in the middle of 1929. His
warning was not taken seriously. Immediately following
the stock market crash of October 29,1929 Johnson developed
his plans to cope with the anticipated slump. His concern
for rank and file employees showed in his methods. No
Johnson and Johnson employees lost their jobs during
the Depression. Instead, Johnson reduced the number
of hours worked. Shifts were made shorter and three
day weekends were adopted twice a month. This stood
in sharp contrast to the more common business practice
of laying off workers in bad times.
Once the threats from the Great Depression were contained,
Robert Johnson was able to devote his full attention
to his agenda for corporate renewal. Labor relations
ranked high on that agenda and over the next few decades
Johnson became an exemplar of the enlightened captain
of industry. His thinking regarding attractive facilities
was based in part on his interest in the well being
of company employees. Johnson and Johnson factories
included, “ modern cafeterias, lounges where (employees)
pay bridge and ping pong – and a plant broadcasting
system for dances and educational programs” (Foster,
p.379). Johnson emphasized high levels of pay and benefits
for all employees (He also championed a federally mandated
high minimum wage). He used a variety of communication
techniques to nurture a family feeling within the company
( He also believed in giving labor formal bargaining
rights and was a champion of federal legislation to
support union organization).
Johnson’s approach to labor relations was based
on a clearly stated view of human nature and social
responsibility. With respect to human nature, Johnson
believed that ( Foster, p.352):
| “ The fundamentals of human nature may
not be ignored in human relations …There are
(five) drives that profoundly influence conduct:
man’s sense of ‘dignity’ …,
the need for the’ esteem of others’
…, the basic’ instinct for survival’
…, the desire for ‘security, …,and
‘social instincts’ (the natural tendency)
to associate with those who share their interests
and to develop teamwork in pursuing common undertakings.” |
This led Johnson to the following philosophy of labor-management
relations ( Foster. p.352):
| “ Human relations …are subject
to moral and religious laws that are reflected in
the conscience of mankind and which have been confirmed
by the experience of men in all ages. If we accept
the brotherhood of man under God, important conclusions
follow. Each man has an inner dignity, with basic
rights and duties. Life has an overall purpose.
Men must judge their conduct, not merely in terms
of personal gain or convenience, but also as right
or wrong.” |
Johnson developed his initial thinking before becoming
familiar with the teachings of the Catholic Church on
this issue. But he later discovered Pope Leo XIII’s
encyclical “On the Condition of the Working Class”
(Rerum Novarum) and Pope Pius XI’s encyclical
“On the Reconstruction of the Social Order”
(Quadragesimo Anno). And as his philosophy evolved he
openly credited those Christian documents as sources
for advanced versions of his philosophy of labor-management
relations (Foster, p. 338).
Johnson’s approach to labor included a concern
for the problem of monotony. He wanted jobs to be structured
so that every worker could find challenge and joy at
work rather than monotony. His motivation was partly
based on the desire to increase productivity. But there
was another motive as revealed by the following Johnson
statement ( Foster, p240):
| “Having always enjoyed my work, I can
imagine nothing more serious than facing a lifetime
of workday monotony. If industry hopes to win a
fuller measure of good-will, ways must be found
to break the monotony or relieve it.” |
Decentralization was a Johnson management practice
which grew directly out of Johnson’s concern for
labor force welfare. Manufacturing facilities were deliberately
kept small enough to allow for the development of a
family feeling. Decision-making authority was pushed
down to lower levels first and foremost to improve productivity
and effectiveness. But Johnson saw this form of empowerment
as a way to address the human needs of the decision-makers
themselves.
Biographer Foster claims that Johnson’s belief
in decentralization and delegation was crystallized
by a specific incident in 1933. The company encountered
a problem in manufacturing plasters using what was supposed
to be an improved formula. Solutions were not forthcoming.
Johnson decided to get involved. He called a meeting
of those working on the problem. Seventeen people came
to the meeting. And immediately Johnson decided that
the problem was that too many people were involved.
He cancelled the meeting and assigned the problem to
a single individual. The problem was soon solved. And
Johnson’s belief in decentralization was strengthened
into what was almost a religion.
Johnson’s practice of decentralization evolved
into what became known as “The Johnson and Johnson
Family of Companies.” Product lines were assigned
to independent units with their own management team.
The company and Johnson himself became recognized as
strong advocates of decentralization (Foster, p. 203).
A 1949 Reader’s Digest article lauded Johnson
in this regard. It argued that decentralization was
the wave of the future even though not yet widely practiced
in American industry. It described the favorable features
of a Johnson and Johnson mill in Georgia. And then it
added (Foster, p.381):
| “The experience of Johnson and Johnson
indicates that the problem of labor unrest can be
solved within the framework of modern technology.
That the solution does not have to be imposed by
government. That the solution can be found by management
and labor working together. And that the key to
it is the worker takes satisfaction in his job and
in his way of life … The (Johnson and Johnson)
mill in Georgia is one man’s contribution
toward the solution of the most deep-seated of all
labor problems – an attempt to make the factory
worker feel that he counts and that management knows
he counts.” |
Women’s rights represented another interesting
aspect of Robert Johnson’s approach to labor relations.
More than half of his own work force consisted of women
and, “ He repeatedly took measures to improve
their lives and give them opportunity to grow (Foster,
p. 328).” He also championed women’s rights
in the political arena through articles he wrote and
speeches he gave.
Active engagement in public policy advocacy also represented
an interesting aspect of Robert Johnson’s approach
to labor relations in general He understood that some
of his dreams for a better life for workers could only
be achieved if the “rules of the game” were
changed. In other words, the legal environment of business
had to be changed. It was for that reason that he became
engaged in a fight to raise the minimum wage in the
1930s and supported labor unions.
Robert Johnson did more than advocate public policy
from outside of government. He took the next step and
volunteered to work as a public servant in special circumstances.
The most notable and controversial such episode was
his tenure as head
of the U.S. government’s Smaller War Plants Corporation
during World War II. His challenge was to find ways
to get small businesses to participate in production
for the war effort. Most of his client small businesses
were in danger of failing due to the shrinking of the
domestic consumer economy. Opposing him were some 252
large corporations that held a high percentage of existing
war contracts. Also beginning to oppose him was the
military hierarchy. Johnson had entered public service
with an appointment as a colonel in the U.S. Army. When
opposition to his efforts appeared in the military hierarchy,
President Roosevelt elevated Johnson to the rank of
Brigadier General (of Army Ordnance). Henceforth, Johnson
would be known as General Johnson.
Johnson achieved some success. He was able to provide
war work to 1,285 small businesses that had previously
been shunned. But his opposition grew, in part due to
the strong public statements he was prone to make, statements
criticizing inefficiencies in government operations.
Eventually his enemies succeeded in getting him to resign
out of frustration with the criticism of his efforts.
Summing up Johnson’s accomplishment, Foster says
( p. 271):
| “ (He) had worn himself to a frazzle,
physically and emotionally. His march on Washington
was now about over. It had been neither a supreme
victory nor a crushing defeat. He had focused national
attention on the plight of small businesses and
diverted substantial war work their way, but he
fell short of the billions of contracts he had promised
in the early days as chairman of the SWPC. He never
came close to that goal.” |
Another high ranking item on the corporate renewal
agenda was business ethics. During the 1930s General
Johnson formulated various company ethics statements.
That activity eventually resulted in what became known
as Johnson and Johnson’s Credo. Johnson’s
1944 statement of the Credo read (Foster, pp. 336-338):
“We believe that the first responsibility
of business is to its customers.
Products must always be good, and manufacturers
must strive to
make them better at lower prices.
Orders must be promptly and accurately filled.
Dealers must make fair products in order
that they may give good service.
The second responsibility of business is
to those who work with it: to the men
and women in factories, stores, and offices as
well as in service establishments
and on farms.
They must have a sense of security in their
jobs.
Wages must be fair and adequate
Management just,
Hours short, and
Working conditions clean and orderly.
Workers should have an organized system
for suggestions and complaints.
Foreman and department heads must be competent
and fair-minded
There must be opportunity for those who
are qualified to advance as workers
and as people.
Each person must be considered an individual
standing on his own dignity
and merit.
The third responsibility of business is
to its management:
Our executives must be persons of talent,
education experience and ability.
They must be persons of common sense, endowed
with full and trained
understanding.
The fourth responsibility is to owners and
stockholders:
Business must make a sound profit, since,
in order for it to continue
Reserves must be created,
Research must be carried on,
Adventurous programs developed and,
Mistakes made and paid for.
Bad times also must be provided for;
High taxes paid,
New machines purchased,
New factories built,
New products launched, and
New sales plans developed.” |
The Johnson and Johnson Credo continued to be a force
for ethical conduct at the company after Robert Johnson’s
death. This was dramatically illustrated in 1982. Someone
laced Tylenol capsules with cyanide poison and seven
innocent persons were killed. The company’s top
executives acted quickly with the Credo explicitly informing
their actions. Tylenol was withdrawn from the market.
The company went out its way to be totally open with
the press and, therefore, the public. Johnson and Johnson
suffered a short run revenue drop. But the company’s
reputation as an ethical paragon was strengthened (
Foster, pp. 617- 638).
One topic omitted by the 1944 credo was the corporation’s
social responsibility in areas of public policy. That
issue was not overlooked by General Johnson. He was
a firm believer in a corporate responsibility to promote
public policies related to the company’s areas
of competence. Johnson and Johnson was a member of the
health care community. And so it was only natural that
Johnson would lead the company into public policy activities
related to health care either directly or through his
personal involvement.
Under Johnson’s leadership the company funded
America’s first School of Hospital Administration
at Northwestern University in 1943. After World War
II the U.S. dropped a war time nursing education program.
Johnson got involved in lobbying for the resumption
of the program. He also provided stipends for nurses
taking refresher courses. Johnson became deeply involved
in restructuring the management of a local hospital
and he encouraged company executives to volunteer time
working with the hospital. That effort was subsequently
expanded to other hospitals in the area.
Other small scale examples abound. But the one truly
sensational contribution of General Johnson to American
health care was a bequest. In his will he designated
his huge holding of Johnson and Johnson stock as a gift
to the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Johnson had created
the foundation years earlier using personal funds. And
the foundation had been making grants to local hospitals
and medical school students. But the principal was small
compared to the $ 300 million the foundation received
from Johnson’s estate. The Robert Wood Johnson
Foundation would become one of if not THE world’s
premier health care philanthropies.
There was one corporate reform that Johnson did not
plan to make at the time he became the company’s
president – going public. Johnson was well aware
of the restraints the public ownership would put on
his plans. Nevertheless he took a chance in 1944 when
the company went public. Johnson remained the largest
stockholder, and, despite his occasional grumbling about
public ownership, the change did not seem to alter his
management style nor his effectiveness.
MANAGEMENT STYLE
Robert Johnson’s management style contained
paradoxical elements. He could be a micro manager. Yet
most of the time he gave others a great deal of autonomy.
He was tolerant of mistakes. But woe to the employee
who was a repeat offender. He believed in hands-on behavior
by top management. His unannounced plant visits were
legion and legendary. Yet he would spend weeks at a
time away from the business. He believed in and practiced
relationships in which he made it clear that he regarded
employees as his equal or peer. Yet, particularly in
later years, he seemed to encourage being addressed
as General Johnson.
One aspect of his management style was his passion for
open and effective communication. He was constantly
reaching out to communicate with employees and that
meant listening as well as speaking ( Foster, pp. 367
ff). He also took an interest in external communication.
He was particularly concerned about truth in advertising
( Foster, 310-313). And in his later years he became
a writer of some note. This was due in part to his stature
as head of a major American corporation and as an apparently
liberal business leader. But it also had something to
do with his ideas. After World War II Johnson authored
several books and numerous magazine articles in which
he set forth his views on business and public policy.
General Johnson assumed the presidency of Johnson and
Johnson with an attitude of stewardship. His role, as
he saw it, was to improve upon his father’s work
and to then hand the enterprise over to the next generation
of stewards-managers. It was his hope that his son,
Robert W. Johnson, Jr. would eventually be that successor
steward. And in 1947, when junior joined the board it
looked like that might be the case. But junior did not
live up to the father’s expectations. And so General
Johnson put the interests of the company above the interests
of the family and arranged for an alternative successor
management. That plan worked and the company’s
greatness was continued by the first two successor managers
put in place by the General.
In 1967 Johnson’s health began to deteriorate.
He died of liver cancer on January 30, 1968
Foster, Lawrence G. Robert Wood Johnson. State College,
Pennsylvania: Lillian Press, 1999.
|